Friday, November 4, 2011

postheadericon Joe Biden On The Internet: 'If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It... Unless Hollywood Asks You To'

if the impact is not so large. It is almost certain that VP Joe Biden is for the protection of intellectual property / E-parasite / soup. Since the beginning of this administration, President Obama has delegated most of the issues of copyright and Biden Biden overview of copyright seems to be "everything you do should be the happiest of Hollywood fantastic

". How do you describe your continued support for the copyright law more stringent, against the evidence suggests that makes things worse? How else can one explain his claim that he has "all stakeholders" in relation to copyright in a summit meeting, when only the government officials involved and the major labels and studios (no consumer advocates , not artists, not technicians, not entrepreneurs, etc.)?



At the same time, the theme of "Internet freedom" were handled by the State Department, where Hillary Clinton and her team have done a good job. Wikilkeaks response was a little hiccup, but ... as a whole took a strong position on the importance of Internet freedom, and they deserve credit for that. Of course, as noted, these two questions seem to come into conflict over copyright policy and legislation to protect intellectual property and / soup / E-parasite. These good Biden happy, of course, but seriously disrupt people in the State Department, recognizing that his message completely undermines the freedom of the Internet, to be against censorship and allow free movement information online.
In any case, use it as a background for understanding the difficulty of following. Hillary Clinton was talking about earlier this week at the London Conference on Cyberspace (LCC), to give a speech on the importance of freedom in cyberspace. At the last minute, however, had to withdraw because his mother fell ill. Therefore, Joe Biden, took a step up, and gave him what looks like a variation on Clinton's speech was supposed to ... talk about the importance of freedom on the Internet
and regulation of the Internet
You can take a lot of what he says as a clear case against PROTECT IP / soup / E-parasite

know it will take many years and the commitment of the patient and persistent, with people around the world to build consensus around cyberspace, but there no shortcuts, as citizens should not be made online, as some have suggested, not decreed by groups of governments to make decisions for them, somewhere above. No citizen of any country should be subject to a complete code execution when sending e-mail or post a comment on a story.

It should be possible to share their innovations with consumers around the world simply because they live across national borders. This is not how the Internet should never work in our opinion -. If we want to stay where economic exchanges, political and social can flourish

done. Therefore, you can get rid of Biden support the Great Wall of America's approach is the soup? Can you join the support to make DNS Biden (and more!) Blocking for people in the United States can not reach certain Web sites around the world can achieve, based solely on a code of repressive government? And in the soup, innovators would clearly not be able to share their innovations with consumers on the planet due to the massive obligations imposed on them by law.

Now, there are some that have a different opinion, as you all know. They seek an international legal instrument that would take exclusive control over the resources of the Internet governance, institutions and the content and national barriers to the free flow of information online. But that, in our opinion, lead to a fragmented Internet, connecting people, but the gap, a stagnant cyberspace, not an innovation, and ultimately a less secure cyberspace with less confidence among nations.



Again, can we assume that Biden is coming against DNS / IP blocking, which is in the soup? After all, there was ample evidence that, too, that "lead to a fragmented Internet, connecting people, but the gap, a stagnant cyberspace, not an innovation, and ultimately a less secure cyberspace less confident." It is good to see that, although I wonder if they know everything, when the same arguments that are presented more soup.
We have an expression in our country: if it is not broke do not fix it. It would be wrong, in our opinion, to break the system that worked so well for so long.


Find best price for : --Hollywood----internet----Clinton----Hillary----Biden--

0 comments:

Blog Archive